Monday, August 20, 2018

#48 words, magic pills, evil, a sculpture, miscellany




Good afternoon.

            We are now approaching the end of the canicular time of year.  We look forward to it all during Jan-Feb-March, and then (at least some of us) don't want to dree the heat and humidity so we stay inside in the air-conditioned house or office.  Such is part of the ambivalence many feel about weather in the upper Midwest.  (Yeah, I had fun with a couple of words I ran across.)

* * *

            I didn't even have to read this article to think "no kidding?"  "Aging overweight scuba divers at risk of underwater heart attack."

* * *

            For reasons that now escape me, Kathy and I were talking the other night about the desirability of having available a "magic pill."  If you were to take the pill, you would drift off to sleep, never to awaken.  I am sure that there are reams and reams of material written on the subject of rational suicide; I have read none of it.  These are merely reflections on a conversation over cocktails.

            I have just enough of a libertarian streak in me—a small but not insignificant one—that I don't believe it's anyone else's business if I were to decide I wanted to exit.  I should not need permission from anyone or any authority.  After a certain age--*what* age is debatable, it could be 50, 60, 70—anyone should be eligible to take the magic pill.  Younger than that, I'd accept the proposition that there should be restrictions (but not outright denial, just a more considered evaluation).

At first I thought one should simply be able to have such a pill in possession, to use at will.  Upon further reflection—but still largely off the top of my head—I realized that it could all too easily become a weapon of homicide. Such a pill should not, it seems obvious, be provided to someone with dementia, hallucinations, or any other psychopathology or psychiatric disorder.  So while I don't believe permission should be needed—for anyone of sound mind of a certain age—I think perhaps that one should have to go to a designated location, with trained professionals present, who will give you the pill once they've ascertained you are in possession of your faculties.  (Requiring such a trip would impose a desirable small hurdle that might be enough to make people re-think their decision.  If they did stop to re-think it, one suspects that in most such cases the decision to want to take the pill might not have been as firm as the person thought.)

There would no doubt be an uproar among "right to life" circles.  The argument isn't quite the same as in the abortion debate, however.  In the latter, the case is made that abortion takes the life of another, someone unable to speak for him/herself.  With the magic pill, however, it is a decision about one's own life.  I imagine many religious groups and organizations would be opposed to allowing ingestion of the magic pill.  I'd argue, however, that it's none of their business what I want to do.

No, I have no interest in taking the magic pill, certainly not at this time of my life.  Nor do I (did we) have anyone in mind when we were talking about it (in case anyone reading this thinks we might have had you as someone who should be considering the option!).

* * *

            I usually don't touch very much on politics in these messages.  The current political situation simply raises my blood pressure and pulse, which is not good for someone who turns 67 today.  Moreover, I doubt seriously any preaching I do on politics here will have any effect whatever in changing anyone's mind, if that were my objective.  So I don't bother.
           
In a departure from my usual stance, however, I cite a piece that Ed Simon wrote in berfrois that I finally decided I agree with.  He begins:  "If your politics are anything like mine, which is to say that you abhor wanton cruelties enacted against children, then surely, you’ve said it, or at least thought it – Donald Trump is an evil man."   (I sent the article to a few friends earlier, so for them these few paragraphs will be repetition.)

            As a friend of mine observed, those who are politically liberal are uncomfortable with the term "evil" because using it in political and public policy matters risks bringing theology into government.  "Evil" is a judgment, an evaluation, usually founded on scripture.  Inasmuch as most liberals vigorously endorse a "wall of separation" between church and state, "evil" isn't a term commonly used on the political left.  Simon continues, making the same point.

That word – evil. A theologian’s word, a churchman’s word, a priest’s word. We might use it in frustration, born out of our sense of defeated helplessness after seeing images of children locked in cages. We use it after looking at the photo of a mother tying her toddler’s shoes in the seconds before being possibly separated forever. . . .  We use it when we consider that thousands of children in the United States of America are being held hostage by an illegitimate and criminal administration who are using them as a bargaining chip. . . .  What word then is more adequate than “evil” to describe what the U.S. government is now doing?

Evil. I don’t want you to just use the word. Don’t just use it as rhetorical intensifier. As pressure gage for your own anger. As goad for those who still support these obvious travesties. . . .  I want you to deeply, completely, and totally understand it for what it literally means. I want you to grapple with the full implications. I don’t want us to think of this as simply a political issue, or even as simply a moral one. I don’t want us to ever discuss this in terms of “civil discourse,” or “agreement and disagreement.” I don’t want any equivocation, ambiguity, or skepticism to cloud our language, and I do not care about the fragile emotions of people so stupid, craven, or wicked themselves that they have supported such atrocities. I want us to say it clearly and literally. I want us to say it as the theologian would. As the churchman. As the priest. I want us to shout it fully knowing its profound truth. That Jeff Sessions is an evil man. Stephen Miller is an evil man. Donald Trump is an evil man.

            I cannot identify the standards by which I finally conclude that an act is evil.  It may be that I stand with Justice Stewart in his approach to pornography:  I can't define it but I know it when I see it.  My only disagreement with Mr. Simon is that his focus is too narrow.  Other actions of the administration will have significant impact on our lives and the lives of our children and grandchildren (if those actions are not reversed).  To mention two off the top of my head, weakening clean air and water standards, so more will be sick and die, and attempting in every way possible to make health insurance unavailable or too expensive, so more will be sick and die.  It is not just the children, although they are the most outrageous example.

            After writing about the use of the term evil, Mr. Simon concludes, with a paragraph another friend of mine expressed envy about (envy that my friend himself had not written the paragraph):

The myth of American exceptionality is finally dead; one day if we’re to even scrub an inch of this painful stain off of the nation it will require truth and reconciliation committees, it will require trials, and the actual imprisonment of the architects of these policies. Trump, Sessions, and Miller deserve to expire in prisons feeling the fear felt by these children and their parents. Most likely, when the time comes, Trump will go out corpulent and satisfied at Mar-a-Lago, living out his days tweeting and bloviating and engorging himself. And if I know anything of my country – and I know something of my country – the press will write about how he was divisive but fresh, polarizing but blunt. And they’ll mitigate his crimes and apologize for his crimes. And what I want you to remember on that day is that any comfort that man received was undeserved, and that he should hope that heaven has no justice.

            If I know it when I see it, then I must conclude, like Mr. Simon, that I am seeing evil.

* * *

            Last spring I invited Pat (Krystin's mom), Elliott, Peggy Hinz, and Christine Lenzen (mom and daughter) to come for brunch in July and we would scatter Krystin's ashes under the maple tree in our back yard that Krystin brought home as a seedling when she was in kindergarten.  Peggy and Christine were like family for Krystin.  Peggy has been taking care of Krystin's two cats for several years (and now permanently); Christine has been Krystin's friend since they met at daycare when they were both 2 years old.

            We all got together briefly on a July morning and scattered a few ashes (and then went out to eat).  But not many ashes:  I thought to look on the web about human remains and learned that they are toxic to trees and plants.  So it was ceremonial.

            I'm pretty sure I did the right thing.  On her Facebook page on July 15, 2014, Krystin noted a link to goodnewsnetwork.org and an article titled "Biodegradable Urns Will Turn You Into A Tree After You Die."  She wrote in her post that "I want to be a tree when I die!  But I want to be a bonsai.  That doesn't seem to be an option."  I know she was probably just being silly, which she liked to be on Facebook posts, but I also suspect that the post reflected her general sentiment about her remains.

 Image result for sculpture emptiness of the soul
 
"We may look as if we carry on with our lives as before. We may even have times of joy and happiness. Everything may seem 'normal.'  But THIS, 'Emptiness' is how we all feel . . . all the time." – John Maddox  (The artwork is called Melancholy by Albert György & is on display in Geneva, Switzerland).  "It takes my breath away, and I am transported to that emptiness.  Every time.  And through time."  Thanks to Barbara Elliott for drawing my attention to this quotation and sculpture.  Another friend later also sent it to me.  It captures the emotions perfectly.

* * *
            I'll put my correction at the end.  In my last missive I alluded to Linus Pauling and vitamin D.  Pauling advocated massive doses of vitamin C, not D.  That's what I get when I make a reference quickly without checking.  I check almost all of what I write—and when I don't, of course I err.  Argh.

* * *

            OK, this epistle turned out to be a little somber.  I didn't intend that focus, and as I send this out, I'm not at all somber (other than seeing that another year has gone by in a flash—ugh).  Enjoy the remainder of the summer!  I'm off this evening for a marvelous dinner with my beloved spouse and son at one of my favorite restaurants.

Gary



No comments:

Post a Comment

Most Read