Sunday, December 10, 2006

2006 annual letter




                                                                        December, 2006

            Greetings.  I hope that all is well with you.

            Dickens got it right when he wrote the always-apropos opening line of A Tale of Two Cities:  It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.  We had them both in the last 12 months.  Pat had medical issues last December (worst), we spent 4+ months in Scotland and traveling in Europe (best), and Krystin ended up in intensive care in a Paris hospital and has been contending with a combination of diabetes and an eating disorder ever since we returned from Scotland in May (worst).  For those few of you who were the involuntary recipients of weekly emails from Scotland while we were there, I will not include a recap of our experiences.  For those of you who were not, and who I think might be interested, I include separately the collected and slightly-rewritten version of those messages.

* * *

But first, a few leftovers from 2005.  One of the more interesting parts of our stay in Tuscany in October, 2005, was a visit to a winery.  I suppose anyone who thinks about it would realize that wine (or whisky or scotch or gin) is made in very large casks.  Until one sees such a cask, however, it is difficult to realize how large they are.  The ones at this vineyard each held 9,000 bottles of wine.  I wonder, however, if the same flavor comes from these large casks as one would get from a small cask—the amount of wood exposed to the wine, per gallon of wine, is much smaller than in a small cask.  After the tour, the winery provided us one of the most spectacular lunches we shall ever have.  The entire group of us who were staying at the villa—I think there were 13 of us—had gone on the winery tour and then sat at a linen-covered table with the usual array of silver and crystal.  The lunch was outside, nestled in the hills of Tuscany, on a perfect autumn day, and there were no bugs.  The meal was exquisite.

The other note is the Brancacci Chapel in the Santa Maria del Carmine church, which we saw in the course of touring around Florence.  It was striking, especially the difference in the paintings of Masaccio and Masolino in the same chapel.  (I think the single greatest intellectual difficulty I had when we saw the many works of art in Florence and Rome was the lineage of the artists:  Giotto taught Masolino, who taught Masaccio, who taught . . . . .  Somewhere Michelangelo and Raphael come in here.  There were so many great Italian renaissance artists that it seems to me impossible to keep track of them barring a full-time many-year study of the art.  I suppose that’s why there are art historians.)

* * *

            I was astonished at the reaction to the memorial statement I wrote for my father and included in my letter last year.  One friend specifically called to tell me he thought it was one of the best things he had ever read.  Several went out of their way to email me to say how splendid they thought it was; one said she was in tears by the time she got to the end.  Several others spoke to me when they saw me to tell me how much they liked it.  I must have unwittingly touched a chord in people, because I certainly didn’t think anything about it except that it was my recollections of my dad.  I think I was as glad that the world still holds pleasant surprises for me as I was at how positively people reacted.

* * *

            As for the worst of times (1):  We had in our family (what appeared to be) another brush with death in December, 2005 (and while it turned out not to so, I didn’t know that at the time).  Pat has had abdominal/groin pains for a couple of years.  She—we—hoped that the hysterectomy in May, 2005, would get rid of them.  It didn’t.  After that operation, she had a series of tests—MRI, CT scan, colonoscopy, ultrasound—to try to locate the source of the pain.  Nothing showed up abnormal.  On a Friday in mid-December, 2005, another ultrasound revealed a “mass” on one of her ovaries.  Her gynecologist (also her surgeon) didn’t like the look of it because it wasn’t showing up as a cyst or something harmless.  So she told Pat she wanted to get it out of there—and she wanted to do it quickly—primarily, we think, so that Pat would have time to recuperate before having to get on a plane for Scotland, not for any medical reason.  Moving so quickly, and rearranging her schedule for Pat, was extraordinarily nice of her.

            Pat and I met with the surgeon on the following Tuesday; the surgeon seemed quite upbeat and her only concern was whether Pat would be able to fly on January 6.  I was somewhat encouraged, but I suspect that surgeons, like anyone else, don’t want to think about the unpleasant possibilities and would rather focus on the positive, especially when she didn’t know what she would find.  She had scheduled the surgery the day after the meeting.

            So we had six days to fret, between the first ultrasound and the scheduled surgery.  I probably worried more than everyone else.  It seemed to me the possible range of outcomes was “really nothing” to life-threatening or life-terminating cancer.  I remembered a judicial rule for evaluating cases involving free speech enunciated by Judge Learned Hand:  the courts were to take into account “the gravity of the evil, discounted by its improbability.”  That is, the greater the danger the speaker advocated, the more permissible it is to restrict the speech.  The poor analogy here was, for me, that even though a devastating outcome was not likely, the “gravity of the evil” (for me and our family) led me to worry a great deal.

            Fortunately, when the surgeon came to see me after the surgery while Pat was in recovery, she said it had gone perfectly and that it did not appear that the lesion was cancerous or life-threatening—and that, in any event, whatever it was was gone as a result of the surgery.  As a friend of mine put it in an email to me the day after the surgery, “now you can relax and enjoy life again.”  He hit the nail on the head with that comment.

            I commend these threats (whether real or perceived, there is no difference) to your family members if you like distraction from your job, sleeplessness, emotional heartache, upset stomach, and more gray hair.  If you don’t, avoid such situations.  I suffered all of these effects, in mild degree (mild only because they were mitigated by the fact that Pat and the surgeon were so certain of a positive outcome).

* * *

            As for the worst of times (2):  On November 1 I told Elliott it is said that into every life a little rain must fall.  Most of us are constitutionally able to deal with the occasional shower, but few of us are equipped to handle a torrential downpour.  It seemed about then we had a torrential downpour.  Krystin was in the hospital for much of the time after we got back from Scotland; during her stay, her mental condition, and her ability to eat, spiraled downward.  To add insult to injury, at that point in late October our cat Bela was sick, Elliott was sick, Pat had decided to get rid of our (4th) second dog, and we were all greatly stressed by what was going on with Krystin.

Upon return from Scotland, we and Krystin knew she had to get serious help—medical and psychiatric or psychological—to deal with her diabetes and eating.  In short summary, the medical folks concluded (and Krystin agreed) that she had been using insulin as a weight-control device:  if she didn't take a lot of insulin, she could eat like a horse (because insulin is the substance that allows body cells to absorb the blood glucose created by our body from the food we eat).  Unfortunately, not taking enough insulin has bad effects.

            The short summary of events from June to December is that Krystin was in an eating-disorders program at Methodist Hospital, then moved to a residential eating-disorders program in the far suburb of Chaska, the Anna Westin House.  She "flunked" the Anna Westin program (they couldn't deal with someone who could not or would not eat), so ended up back in Methodist, including with a feeding tube for a period.  Krystin was very depressed, not surprisingly.  The Methodist people finally (to put it bluntly) just gave up on her—they decided she was doing well enough on eating that they would release her and see what happened.  All this took about 3-4 months, so it was early November when she came back home.  During this period, of course, we were doing a lot of driving to Methodist and to Anna Westin, but we and she were fortunate to have a lot of friends and relatives come to see her off and on during these events.

            She wasn't "cured," however, and still wasn't eating enough (although she was making an effort).  So we explored other programs, and November 30 Pat flew her to a place northwest of Phoenix for a 60-90-day stay.  It's a "ranch" where the girls/women do horses while also receiving counseling and therapy.  There are a couple of differences between the Arizona program and the Anna Westin House that we like.  First, they have the girls active and doing things (horses) rather than just sitting around all day.  Krystin had no stamina whatever by the end of her stint with Methodist and Anna Westin because she'd not been doing anything physical—this a girl who'd been walking all over Europe and Edinburgh the first part of the year.  Second, they don't require monitoring in the bathroom and elsewhere (I understand why Anna Westin folks did that, but it sure seemed creepy to me).  Third, they're much more relaxed about food—on the theory that if they make food the center of attention, it remains the center of attention for the girls, whereas if it is secondary to living a life, it's less important.  As I compose this, Krystin has only been in Arizona for a few days, but her first impressions are very positive and she's optimistic this will do a lot to help her.

            Pat's had a much harder time emotionally dealing with Krystin and her problems than I (and Elliott) have.  I don't know if that's because there's a difference between us and the distaff side, or if it's particular to our personalities, or it's an attribute of mothers more than fathers, or if there's some other reason.  My temperament (and Elliott's even more so) is pretty difficult to upend; that is less true for Pat and Krystin.  So we've had to work out those differences as we move (stumble?) from event to event.

            For now, however, we are keeping our fingers crossed for Krystin.

            P.S.  The 4th second dog is gone, which has made our house much calmer.  She was an extremely sweet dog, but high-demand and very active.  Pat just couldn't give her the attention she needed and decided her attention had to be focused on Krystin, not on training a dog.  Bela recovered and seems to be doing fine.  Elliott recovered (but keeps coming down with colds!).

(More than) enough of the medical crises.


* * *

            Electronic databases are wonderful things (1).  After receiving 3-4 fund-raising letters from Oregon State University addressed to my dad, to whom they were appealing as an alumnus, I finally found a name and emailed a chap at Oregon State to explain that (1) my father was deceased and (2) as far as I knew, he had never set foot in the state of Oregon, much less obtained a degree from OSU.  I did receive a very apologetic email back, to their credit, explaining that they had my dad in their database as a 1955 graduate of their College of Engineering.  The letters did stop.

            Electronic databases (2).  For the last two years, Elliott has been deluged with college recruiting and admissions materials from all over the Midwest.  Somewhere, someplace, someone has his date of birth about 3 years earlier than it is.  He had not even entered high school when the mailings began coming.  I finally sent an email to the Director of Admissions for the Twin Cities campus of the University when Elliott received material from the U of M; he called me a couple of days later to tell me that admissions recruiting had gotten very aggressive in the last 10 years and that even his office now normally begins sending some materials to 10th-graders.  But he agreed that Elliott was bit young.  I assured him that Elliott would give the fullest consideration to the University of Minnesota. . . .

* * *

            A message on how to celebrate the holidays, and life in general, came from my sister-in-law last winter.  "Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body
thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"  I am inclined to agree, especially after our year.

            Despite the gloomy aspects of the year, however, it wasn't all bad.  Living abroad for 4 months was a wonderful experience; we recommend it for everyone.

            Elliott at age 16 remains a great conversationalist and great kid to have around, although he likes to spend a little too much time on the video games and not quite enough time on the school work.  We spent any number of hours while in Scotland, and since, discussing politics, history, science, religion, aging, grammar, music, technology, and you name it.  Now, if we could just get him to clean up his room once a month or so.

            As the late Joel Tierney, long-time University Attorney, once told me about writing, "brevity is blessed."  (I never seemed to be able to take the lesson to heart.)  While not brief by the standards of most end-of-year letters, this one is brief by mine, as you all know.  And so it ends.

            Have a good year.  We will be in touch.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Most Read