Sunday, December 3, 2023

#105: Coda and warm wishes

 

                                                                        Sunday, December 3, 2023

 Good morning.

             Despite describing my last message as the denouement, here's the real coda to my tales of moving.

I composed this potted and perhaps entirely erroneous history of space allocation in domestic architecture in homes of reasonably (and more than reasonably) affluent people.

Any of you who have visited the palatial homes of multi-gazillionaires of the 19th and early 20th centuries know that the kitchen is out of sight. I think for example of some of the places I've seen: Glensheen in Duluth, Biltmore in Asheville, the James J. Hill House in St. Paul, Ca’ d’Zan in Sarasota. Guests did not see nor step into the kitchen; that was the place for the servants and those who prepared the food. Even in the homes of well-to-do, in any upscale neighborhood built before WWII, the kitchen was typically separated from the dining room and other public and social spaces, although maybe guests might wander into the kitchen to talk with family members who were preparing food. Even in our modest 1931 bungalow, the kitchen was separated from the dining room by a swinging door (which my great aunt promptly and sensibly removed and which we found in the basement 50 years later). After WWII, kitchens became more "public" and family and friends weren't hesitant to socialize in them. As time and taste moved on, into the later 20th century, kitchens became more openly connected to dining areas and other social spaces.

            After I wrote the foregoing "history"—and I purposely chose the word "potted" because I made it all up—I decided to ask someone who knew about such things, so I wrote to a colleague in Architecture at the U of Minnesota. He wrote back:

You are correct. The open kitchen has had several forces driving it—the disappearance of "servants," especially after WWII; the move away from gendered spaces (women in the kitchen, etc.); the desire for the shrinking footprint of houses to feel larger by combining functions into fewer, larger spaces; and the rising interest in the culinary arts in modern culture, with more people interested in preparing meals.

So there's your architectural history lesson for the day.

To get to my point: Our townhouse represents the apotheosis of the trend. The kitchen *is* the social space, and it happens to have a few adjunct spaces for sitting and dining. The granite-topped island in the center is larger than the floor space in our bungalow kitchen.

One odd story. Moving to the townhouse meant losing much of our hutch cabinet space. Kathy spotted an attractive china cabinet on Facebook Marketplace that was reasonably priced at $275. It had inlaid wood and mullioned doors and appeared to date from early in the 20th century. We bought it; the woman selling it even delivered it. Her partner and I carried it into the house and got it placed. She gave us a business card (thick stock, embossed) with a website and an email address. Fine. A bit later I had a question about the cabinet so I emailed her. No such email. So I went to the website. No such website. What?? Now I'm beginning to wonder if we bought stolen goods. Apart from going to the police and asking, there's not much I can about it.

One side benefit to the move: I finally got to buy a *tall* Christmas tree. Our eight-foot ceilings in the bungalow didn't allow a tall tree. The vaulted ceiling in the townhouse meant I could get a 10' tree. I noted several years ago that Kathy and I counted the ornaments as we took them off the tree in late December; we quit counting at 500. I am sure we easily exceeded that number this year. I also got to put on more lights than ever (over 200 C7 bulbs).

We mostly feel at home now, after five weeks, although we still have a lingering sense, as Kathy put it a few days ago, of "gee, this is a nice place, I'm glad these people are letting us stay here."

            I have concluded that the reason people, especially in my age cohort, do not move is because they have to move. If one could wave a magic wand, and have all one's belongings—clothes, dishes, furniture, everything—instantly transported and put in place in a new residence, I suspect that quite a few people I know would move fairly quickly. Alas, there is no such teleporter of goods and the means to put them away. Perhaps an AI robot can put everything away in the future. That assumes you know where you want everything to be put, which we certainly did not before moving in. If the robot put everything away, the robot would have to find it all. Even though we, not our robot, put everything away, not even we could find everything later.

            In lieu of a holiday/Christmas card, as always, I wish my friends and relatives a peaceful and happy season and year. I try to interact with all of you during the year (at least electronically) and put a high value on that continued contact. Let's keep that up!

            Warmly, and with good thoughts about all of you,

            Gary

           

 

 

 

Sunday, November 12, 2023

#104: The Annals of Selling and Buying and Moving IV (the denouement)

 

 Sunday morning November 12, 2023

So, the deed is done.

            We now live in a townhouse with four rooms (not counting bathrooms and hallways). As I have related earlier, on the main floor we have a kitchen and a bedroom. The kitchen has two adjoining sitting areas and a dining area, but it's one room. The bedroom is the largest one I've ever had (although that bar is pretty low because I've never had a "large" bedroom, but even so this one is good sized).

            On the lower level there is a large room and a small room. One is my office; the other is general purpose. Mostly to be used by Gary.

            In our 1931 bungalow, we had nine discrete rooms. Nonetheless, we went from about 1700 finished square feet in that house to about 2000 finished square feet in the townhouse. I haven't measured, but I think our kitchen and surrounds is over half the square footage.

            I am glad to have read, in many places, that continuing to face mental challenges is one way to forestall cognitive decline, because I face mental challenges almost daily in trying to learn the local geography. Gone are the ordered alphabetic and numeric streets and avenues of Minneapolis that I have lived with almost my entire life. Now there are "drives" and "courts" and other designations for streets. They curve every which way. My poor brain has to absorb an entirely new and wholly irregular map of the area. I have to use Google maps just to go to the hardware store.

            We had six days between closing and moving day (by design). Kathy abhors wallpaper (I like it in some places but don't feel strongly enough about it to argue for it), so we had almost all the (golfing-focused and Paris-focused) wallpaper removed and the walls repainted. I was dumbfounded by the cost of a gallon of paint. I had the illusion that it would cost about $30-40 for a good-quality paint. So when we were at the local Sherwin-Williams store, I told the guy I preferred to buy high-quality paint because it covers better and cleans better. That would be $121 per gallon, he told me. Nope. He then told us that for walls that don't see a lot of wear, their third-from-bottom-in-quality paint worked fine. Only $70 per gallon. Yikes.

            The move itself was routine. We had a good moving crew (we and they joked several times) and nothing of note broke. No surprise to me, although it was to them: It took them longer than they'd scheduled and they had to add a fifth mover to finish by the end of the day. I told the guy at the moving company that his estimate of time was too low. I was right. We had far more boxes than they expected, even though I warned them!

            One oddity of moving: The moving company would not move houseplants. They won't move anything "alive." I can understand refusing to move pets, like cats and dogs and so on, but houseplants? We have several large plants that are in good-sized ceramic pots—so they are heavy. I didn't want to lift them. I argued unsuccessfully that their policy was stupid (I was more polite than that). Fortunately, a friend had an SUV in which we could fit the plants without breaking off tops or branches, so we got them moved, but I still had to lift and carry the darn things. If you're planning on moving someday, and you have heavy houseplants, be aware. (We also had several pots with nothing but dirt in them, for Kathy's vegetables next spring—we have a wonderful south-facing deck that will be perfect for growing vegetables—and they didn't even want to move those; "we're not supposed to move soil." For Pete's sake. The team leader, however, said that if I signed a waiver, they'd move them. I did. What am I worried about with the waiver? That they're going to dump them out during the move?)

            Despite having movers (who were very good about putting all the boxes and furniture where we told them to (including the pots with dirt!), we still ended up lifting and carrying a lot of boxes hither, thither, and yon once the movers had departed. We used ibuprofen several times.

            I think we surprised ourselves by getting about 90% of the unpacking and putting away done in 4-5 days. That efficiency was no doubt helped by the fact that CenturyLink, our internet provider, couldn't get here until six days after we moved; we didn't have the distraction of email and web. (I hate doing email on my phone; youngsters and even some older folks can use both hands and key almost as fast as on a laptop keyboard. I cannot, so for me it's one letter at a time, a tedious and annoying way to communicate and certainly not one I can use for anything more complicated than a couple of sentences.)

            Kathy and I were both prepared to have a friendly disagreement about how much to hang on the walls and where to hang it. We didn't. Another surprise. What's puzzling both of us is two wall spaces (fairly large): we don't have anything to hang on them that we particularly like. We have things but we're both "meh" about our choices. Inasmuch as we moved with far more items to hang than we have wall space, and still have items lined up against the wall in the lower level, the idea that we'll buy *more* things to hang on the wall is astonishing—and not in the cards. We do not want *more* stuff.

            You know one of the things I miss most about our old house? The basement. It served not only as laundry room but also storage room for Xmas decorations, the additional refrigerator and freezer, extra foodstuffs, winter jackets, and a multitude of other things. Now we have no basement. Finding a place for all that stuff has been a challenge. (And yes, we kept too much.)

            One benefit of the move for me is that I finally get to use my antique sound system to listen to music while painting. It is antique because I have two speakers (that can double as end tables, a style that Kathy tells me is no longer made) that I bought when I still lived at home with my parents (so sometime in the late 1960s; my mother thought the $35 I paid for each of them was outrageous). The receiver also dates from an earlier age, although it has a connection for a CD player, so I guess it's from the mid-1980s. All of that antique equipment was on our main floor, so I rarely used it. When I unpacked it all, I would not have been surprised if one or more parts of this system were kaput; they've all seen many moves and they're so old. But nope, after I got it set up—which I had to think about a bit since I hadn't disconnected and reconnected everything for over three decades—it broadcast perfectly good sound.

            My ear may not be that great; maybe it isn't perfectly good sound. But it sounds good to me. I'm not an audiophile.

In terms of (not) decluttering, I am playing a sneaky trick on Elliott & Martha. Over the last couple of years, as I attempted to declutter, I've been putting items in boxes and labeling them "items for Elliott." They are all xerox boxes, so decent sized, and there are about 15 of them. It's a wide miscellany, and I've told him that he and Martha can decide whatever they wish about the contents of the boxes--just don't tell me what they did. (Yes, he knows about the boxes but has no idea what's in any of them.) So I've passed the decision about many things to him 😊 I have been careful to tell him—and put small notes in or on objects—so he knows their provenance. I won't be around to know what disposition he makes of all of it!

One set of items we owned were coffee cups and saucers that went with my (from my marriage to Pat) china. They had sat in the back corner of a cupboard for the entire time I lived in the house. They were small cups, but that didn't matter; almost no one drinks coffee at night anymore (after a dinner party, for example). I didn't want to keep them. Kathy offered them to her niece as espresso cups—and her niece took them. Glad they'll be put to use.

In one significant respect the City of Minneapolis has it all over the suburb of Minnetonka (and probably plenty of other suburbs, although I don't know that): In Minneapolis you can put out just about anything on garbage day and the city will take it, and if you have more recycles or garbage than your bin can hold, you put them out anyway and the city will take it. In Minnetonka, if it doesn't fit in the bins, you can't leave it out; you have to transport it yourself to a disposal or recycling site. (And you may not leave your bins visible; they either have to be surrounded by a wall or kept in your garage. I suppose all my friends in the suburbs are accustomed to these regulations; we are not. I think there is great virtue in the city policy.)

It has been interesting to watch Elliott & Martha transform the house that I lived in for 34 years. We had rather conventional colors on the walls: white, a pale green here and there, a small maroon accent wall. (The "family room" had lightish olive green walls and cranberry carpeting, modeled after the colors in Sir John Soane's Museum in London.) They are painting the rooms teal and turquoise and forest green and navy and maroon and a dark yellow, with occasional goldish-yellow accents. I speculated that my great-aunt Inez, who lived in the house from 1940 to 1989, would be shocked at the new wall colors, but then I decided "no, she would not," because at one point she painted the kitchen a bright pink. In any event, I'm sure she'd just be astonished but pleased that her great-great nephew and his wife are now living in her house, after her great-nephew (me) lived there for the 34 years after she did.

            One of my friends wrote back after my last "moving" epistle. "Your note about "getting rid of bowls, platters. . . " reminds me of one of my colleagues/friends who 'downsized' all of their eating stuff to 4 plates, 4 bowls, and 4 sets of silverware.  She said it was the most free-ing thing she ever did." That works if you never want to have company—and you want to wash all your dishes by hand every time you use them.

            Another friend wrote back that she agreed with our sentiment that we didn't want to move into a senior community and live "amongst a bunch of old people." She added "ha!" My friend is 90.

            OK, I'm all done with stories about moving.

            Gary

Friday, October 6, 2023

#103 The Annals of Selling and Buying and Moving III

 

October 6, 2023

Greetings from the box capital of south Minneapolis.

            We are now legally homeless. Elliott and Martha closed on our house this morning. We own no home and have no place rented. Presumably this situation will only last for two weeks, when we are scheduled to close on our townhouse.

 Some might say I'm overthinking and obsessing about this move. They would be right.

I have long maintained that "moving," for reasonably affluent people, is one of the more obnoxious tasks that humanity has devised for itself. In response to a question from a friend about that descriptions, I said I put in the modifier "reasonably affluent" because they're the ones who accumulate "stuff" far beyond their need. Those at the lower end of the income scale typically don't have the means to acquire too much stuff.

            As I went merrily bubble wrapping along, it occurred to me that if we never planned to entertain again, we could have gotten rid of a huge amount of bowls, platters, table settings, glasses, and so on. Since we don't intend to become hermits, all of our entertaining accoutrements had to come along with us.

            A good friend wrote back, in response to the Annals II:

            Your letter has strengthened my resolve to do one of the following:

1.  Die first.

2.  If #1 doesn't work, then sell the house to one of those "we buy ugly houses" or "homestead" groups where you take out what you want and they deal with the rest, fix up the house, and sell it.

3.  If #3 fails, then I'm going with some group like Gentle Transitions or Seamless Transitions to help with the move.

Both #2 and #3 cost money... so my major plan is #1!!

Kathy and I both laughed out loud when I read this to her.

            Some friends of ours told me that when they make the transition from a house long lived in to the next phase of their lives, it will likely be a seniors community of some sort. Kathy and I decided that we weren't ready, as one friend wrote, to live "amongst a bunch of old people." Someday, probably, but not yet. I hope that when that time comes, we'll recognize and welcome it.

            It was difficult for us to find a place, as I mentioned. Part of the reason for that is because we got into the market late in the summer, past the prime selling time. The reason we got into the market late was because of Martha. It was not an easy decision for her. She had hoped that she and Elliott could find a "new" place, all their own, with no history, rather than move into the house that her husband grew up in. We understood completely and urged them to look around to see what they could find. They did so, saw a number of houses, and as they learned what was available for the price they could afford, it became increasingly clear that buying our house was by far the best deal they were going to get. (We gave them a good price.) Elliott knew all along that buying his childhood home was likely going to be the best option for the money but he had to give Martha time and space to reach that same conclusion, as did we. Now she's all in on the deal and they have many plans for painting and rearranging room use and so on. We assured her repeatedly that once they bought it and took possession, it was *their* house and they could do with it whatever they wanted and we would have no criticism. I think that helped her decide. (I should add that we like Martha very much; Elliott made a wonderful choice of a spouse. Of course, so did she 😊)

            Kathy and I have painted a few walls in accent colors and I retained the leftover paint. I asked Elliott which of the containers I should leave for them (in case they wanted to touch up nail holes, for example) and which I should take to the local hazardous waste disposal site. He told me to take all the paint away. OK then! We will later visit a house with very different color schemes than the ones we left behind. It will be fun to see what they choose. As we promised Martha, we will offer no criticism.

            It's funny, the instinct to collect. I have often said that in another life, I'd be an archivist. I had the instinct early on; I saved things beginning in my teenage years. My grandparents or parents would say they were going to toss something and I'd take it. When we had to clean out houses after a move or a death, I'd be the only one who'd save items. So I ended up with (what I think are) interesting pieces. Nobody else wanted this stuff.

            Elliott didn't inherit that instinct to collect. Fortunately (I guess, at least from my standpoint), I think he is slowly coming around to share my view about keeping items that link us to our forebears, so I think he'll retain much of it. Or at least some of it. Martha likes that kind of stuff, too, so she won't let him toss TOO much! I've told him, for example, that he must be one of few people in his generation who has photos of *all* of his great-great-grandparents on one side of his family (mine).

            We fancied ourselves competent viewers of places we might consider buying. We weren't. When we walked into and then around the townhouse we are buying, we loved the large open dining-kitchen-living room and the large master (now "primary") bedroom. We also liked the location far more than any other place we had seen.

            What we didn't take into account is the habits of our daily lives vis-à-vis the spaces. In our house, Kathy and I each have our spaces; we are in and out of each other's spaces all the time—it's not as if they're private, no-entry spaces—but we have locations where we engage in our activities. In the townhouse, I have plenty of Gary space, but Kathy gets shorted on Kathy space. Neither of us thought of this, or saw it, until we'd signed the purchase agreement and began contemplating where furniture would be placed and where activities would occur. Kathy began to realize that she wouldn't have an "office" or a good space to crochet & stream movies or shows or a place to do jigsaw puzzles while listening to audio books.

            In our relationship, Kathy is the skilled and creative user of the kitchen (for which I am profoundly grateful), and in that respect she has—we have—gained light years over the small galley kitchen of our 1931 house. But for her other activities, we'll have to do some thinking about how to provide space that is comfortable and pleasant. (To be clear, I *do* use the kitchen for breakfast and lunch, on rare occasions make dinner, and am generally in charge of the dishwasher. The unskilled labor.)

            The lower walk-out level consists primarily of a small room (bedroom if one wanted—and it includes a murphy bed, which I haven't seen for decades!) and a large "rec" or family room or whatever you want to call it. Those two rooms will be Gary's space, for office/study, for my paint-by-numbers table, for hosting bridge games, and with my reading sofa. So I come out fine in the space category. Since one major objective in this move is to get to one-floor living (which we only partially achieved), putting any Kathy space on the lower level defeats the purpose entirely because she'd be going up and down stairs all day (again).

            This will be the first time in my life I've not had a gas stove/oven. The townhouse has an electric cooktop set into the kitchen island. We know, however, that gas appliances are a potential health hazard. For example, Iowa State has produced a report detailing the various gases and levels that can accumulate in a house from gas burners. So I will learn to use an electric stove top. (We wouldn't go to all the expense and effort to have gas piped up to the kitchen anyway.) I believe Elliott and Martha intend to convert the gas stove in the house to electric. I know, many of us have lived for years—most or all of our lives—with gas stoves and other appliances and we're still alive and functioning, more or less, so what's the big deal? Removing health threats in our lives wherever we can seems to me to be a good idea. Look how much smarter and healthier we'd be if we hadn't been exposed to noxious gases all our lives.

            Packing books in boxes is boring. But I'd rather do it myself than pay someone $50/hour to do it. Besides, I'll get them in order.

            With warm regards—

            the dusty Gary (who doesn't dust his bookshelves very often)

 

Most Read